Whom to follow, and How many should I follow on Twitter?

by xiaolai on 2009/11/18 · 6 comments

in 计算机相关

You have a twitter account, then you are supposed to have “followings”, “followers”, and “friends” (those who you are following and who are following you).

  • Your twitter update page: http://twitter.com/your-username
  • Your followings: http://twitter.com/your-username/following
  • Your followers: http://twitter.com/your-username/followers

In effect, “friends” are much less important than are “followings” and “followers”. Twitter even didn’t design a devoted page for “friendship”, which itself might have enough implication.

It seems that most people love to have infinite followers, no matter who they are or what they are, but at the same time prefer to meticulously select whom to follow, or even by designing a strict screening rule.

Is that a sound strategy?

Absolutely NOT.

It’s an interesting yet pretty sad fact that most people always want to control what they cannot control.

On twitter, you CANNOT control how many followers you have, simply because whether follow you or not is a decision made by others. What you CAN control is that whom you want to follow and how many you want to follow.

How many followers you have defines the boundary in which your words can spread. On the other hand, how many you are following determines the diameter of your “information-inputting channel”.

One might argue that following too many would create a flood that couldn’t be digested. But the fact is everyone already lives in a flood of information, useful or useless, long before having a twitter account. It simply doesn’t matter at all.

Hootsuite, which provides “group” functionality, makes it easy to devote a single column displaying small portion of your vast followings, rendering information flow easily readable and digestible. In fact, numerous twitter applications provide similar mechanism, seesmic, for example. Oh, twitter itself recently published their own “list” functionality.

What you don’t know is much more important than what you’ve already known. This is the wisdom came from Professor Umberto Eco, who has a personal library of more than 30,000 books.

Others might also refute: “Twitter has almost infinite users, do you suggest that one should follow them all? That’s simply impossible!” Of course that’s not my suggestion! What make twitter fascinating is that twitter has been recording every tweet from the very beginning, which is called “public_timeline”: http://twitter.com/public_timeline.

My own strategy goes like this:

  • Follow all of those who are following me.
  • Follow all of those who had conversations with me.
  • Follow all of those who disapprove my published opinions (which is extremely important for me).
  • Follow all of those whose tweets are more of facts than opinions.
  • When something is at stake, use search engine instead.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

yaoeryi November 18, 2009 at 16:23

twitter的list可以解决一部分信息太滥的问题,但正如“What you don’t know is much more important than what you’ve already known.”
又有谁清楚谁是真正值得被follow的呢?至少是刚开始的时候,谁都不知道。我刚开始用的时候就是先follow几个值得follow的人,如:笑来\keso等,其它就随机呗

Reply

la-la-land November 18, 2009 at 20:47

哇,才发现笑来的英语还这么好啊!哈哈,真是全才啊!!

Reply

la-la-land November 18, 2009 at 20:48

LS SB!

Reply

yaoeryi November 18, 2009 at 21:13

二楼的肯定是很少来笑来的博客的,笑来以前是在新东方教的哦!!!

Reply

李笑来 November 19, 2009 at 10:11

to yaoeryi:

la-la-land不仅经常来,还经常扮演正反两个角色。

Reply

Boldy November 20, 2009 at 00:06

Hi,
Im depressed…
Boldy

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: