(一)了解评分标准
也许ETS的托福考试(TOEFL iBT®)中的作文考试与中国考生在国内参加过的其它英语考试中的作文考试最大的不同之一就是:托福作文考试 的 评分标准 是公开的[1] 。很多的时候,我很奇怪为什么公开的评分标准放在那里却有很多人视而不见?市面上很多辅导书籍,以及很多培训机构的托福写作老师们竟然也往往如此,整天散布的是与评分标准完全相左的所谓“技巧”——要命的是还有很多人相信,并且还是在已经购买了书价相对昂贵的《新托福考试官方指南》的情况下。(TOEFL考试是ETS的一个重要产品,而《新托福考试官方指南》就相当于是TOEFL的产品说明书——生活中就确实有很多人购买任何产品都从来不去认真读产品说明书……)
以下是托福作文考试的评分标准:
综合测试评分标准(Integrated Writing Rubrics)
Score 5
A response at this level successfully selects the important information from the lecture, and coherently and accurately presents this information in relation to the relevant information presented in the reading. The response is well organized, and occasional language errors that are present do not result in inaccurate or imprecise presentation of content or connections.
Score 4
A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas.
Score 3
A response at this level contains some important information from the lecture and conveys some relevant connection to the reading, but it is marked by one or more of the following:
- Although the overall response is definitely oriented to the task, it conveys only vague, global, unclear, or somewhat imprecise connection of the points made in the lecture to points made in the reading.
- The response may omit one major key point made in the lecture.
- Some key points made in the lecture or the reading, or connections between the two, may be incomplete, inaccurate, or imprecise.
- Errors of usage and/or grammar may be more frequent or may result in noticeably vague expressions or obscured meanings in conveying ideas and connections.
Score 2
A response at this level contains some relevant information from the lecture, but is marked by significant language difficulties or by significant omission or inaccuracy of important ideas from the lecture or in the connections between the lecture and the reading; a response at this level is marked by one or more of the following:
- The response significantly misrepresents or completely omits the overall connection between the lecture and the reading.
- The response significantly omits or significantly misrepresents important points made in the lecture.
- The response contains language errors or expressions that largely obscure connections or meaning at key junctures, or that would likely obscure understanding of key ideas for a reader not already familiar with the reading and the lecture.
Score 1
A response at this level is marked by one or more of the following:
- The response provides little or no meaningful or relevant coherent content from the lecture.
- The language level of the response is so low that it is difficult to derive meaning.
Score 0
A response at this level merely copies sentences from the reading, rejects the topic or is otherwise not connected to the topic, is written in a foreign language, consists of keystroke characters, or is blank.
独立测分标准(Independent Writing Rubrics)
Score 5
An essay at this level largely accomplishes all of the following:
- effectively addresses the topic and task
- is well organized and well developed, using clearly appropriate explanations, exemplifications, and/or details
- displays unity, progression, and coherence
- displays consistent facility in the use of language, demonstrating syntactic variety, appropriate word choice, and idiomaticity, though it may have minor lexical or grammatical errors.
Score 4
An essay at this level largely accomplishes all of the following:
- addresses the topic and task well, though some points may not be fully elaborated
- is generally well organized and well developed, using appropriate and sufficient explanations, exemplifications, and/or details
- displays unity, progression, and coherence, though it may contain occasional redundancy, digression, or unclear connections
- displays facility in the use of language, demonstrating syntactic variety and range of vocabulary, though it will probably have occasional noticeable minor errors in structure, word form, or use of idiomatic language that do not interfere with meaning.
Score 3
An essay at this level is marked by one or more of the following:
- addresses the topic and task using somewhat developed explanations, exemplifications, and/or details
- displays unity, progression, and coherence, though connection of ideas may be occasionally obscured
- may demonstrate inconsistent facility in sentence formation and word choice that may result in lack of clarity and occasionally obscure meaning
- may display accurate but limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary.
Score 2
An essay at this level may reveal one or more of the following weaknesses:
- limited development in response to the topic and task
- inadequate organization or connection of ideas
- inappropriate or insufficient exemplifications, explanations, or details to support or illustrate generalizations in response to the task
- a noticeably inappropriate choice of words or word forms
- an accumulation of errors in sentence structure and/or usage.
Score 1
An essay at this level is seriously flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses:
- serious disorganization or underdevelopment
- little or no detail, or irrelevant specifics, or questionable responsiveness to the task
- serious and frequent errors in sentence structure or usage.
Score 0
An essay at this level merely copies words from the topic, rejects the topic, or is otherwise not connected to the topic, is written in a foreign language, consists of keystroke characters, or is blank.
大多数情况下,仅读一遍是不够用的。古人说,“读书千遍其义自现”其实颇有一些道理。不过,这短短几百词,也没必要读上一千遍才行。重新读的时候,不妨拿出纸笔做一点点的记录:
- 5分与4分之间究竟有怎样的差异?
- 4分与3分之间究竟有怎样的差异?
- 3分与2分之间究竟有怎样的差异?
- 2分与1分之间究竟有怎样的差异?
- 0分么,就没必要深究了……
把这些要点再重新整理一下,而后再逐条对照一下评分标准,看看有没有进一步的补充?
整理出来的这些条目,就是考生在托福作文考试中应该避免的缺陷或者错误;如若犯了其中的任何一条,都无法获得满分;如果这些缺陷错误全部能够克服,那么,即便有一些其它的缺陷,也依然可以获得满分——至少是很好的成绩。
如果,以上简单的步骤全部都做完了(估计也就花费个把小时而已),那么,任何一个正常人都很难再相信那些道听途说、以讹传讹的所谓“技巧”了。有的时候,自己动手,没什么不好。
Footnotes:



{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
关于说明书-我的工作体会是:很多人没有阅读说明书(或者“帮助”)的习惯,比如复印机和打印机只会最简单的功能,稍有问题就不知如何处理;天天使用office软件,却从来没有使用过附带的”帮助“,日复一日年复一年笨拙的操作着,宁愿加班也不愿尝试新的方法;经常使用casio的计算器,却从来不学习MC\MR\M+\M-的用法,把计算器当成算盘使用;这样的事情还有很多,因此考生没有认真阅读官方评分标准也就不奇怪了。大家都这样。
归根结底,还是人性最大的弱点:懒惰在作祟啊
发现点previous entries 和 next entries, URL变化了,可是页面内容没有变化…..
似乎pdf的链接不对。
老师:
前几天托同学给我买了一本TOEFL iBT 高分作文 (在您指定的专卖店以正版的价格买的正版)应该怎么用好这本书呢?
呵呵,我指定过专卖店?
请事先仔细读前言。
前言里面说清楚了如何使用该书。
或许是新东方指定的
看了托福的作文,更深刻的的了解到高中的语文作文其实是在教人怎么瞎扯——不着边际的没头脑的瞎扯……开头结尾两个排比,中间一堆名人事例,哪叫作文啊。学了三年,连怎么想问题,怎么表达想法都忘了。
看了TOEFL iBT 高分作文感触颇深。
我还是喜欢“ENGLISH IN USE”的界面。现在我好不容易才能找到“托福写作急速突破”。希望能加强英语文章的分类。谢谢。